The Mediterranean diet may be able to add "reduces risk of breast cancer" to its long list of health benefits, according to a new study from Spain.
In the study, researchers found that women who were asked to follow a Mediterranean diet that was high in extra-virgin olive oilwere 68 percent less likely to develop breast cancer than those who were advised only to reduce the amount of fat in their diets.
In the study, 4,152 post-menopausal women who had never had breast cancer were asked to follow one of three diets: One was a Mediterranean diet rich in extra-virgin olive oil (extra-virgin olive oil accounted for 15 percent of their daily calories), the second was a Mediterranean diet rich in nuts, and the third was a control diet, in which the women were advised to reduce the amount of fat they ate. After about five years, 35 women in the study had developed breast cancer.
Women in the extra-virgin olive oil group were the least likely to developbreast cancer. The researchers also observed a slight decrease in risk for the women in the nut group, but this was not statistically significant (meaning it could have been due to chance), according to the study published today (Sept. 14) in JAMA Internal Medicine.
The Mediterranean diet contains many components that have been suggested to have anti-tumor effects, Dr. Miguel Martinez-Gonzalez, a professor of preventive medicine at the University of Navarra in Spain and co-author of the study, told Live Science in an email. Extra-virgin olive oil in particular is rich in compounds called polyphenols, which have been shown in lab studies to have anti-cancer effects, he said.
Indeed, the study found that the greater the percentage of calories that came from extra-virgin olive oil in the women's diets, the lower their risk of developing breast cancer, Martinez-Gonzalez told Live Science. "For every additional 5 percent of calories from extra-virgin olive oil, the risk was reduced [by] 28 percent," he said.
However, the researchers do not know if the lower risk may have been lowered due to the extra-virgin olive oil on its own, or if it was the effect of oil working in combination with the rest of the diet, he said.
The Mediterranean diet — rich in plants, fish and olive oil, and low in meat and dairy products — has been shown to reduce risk of heart disease and cancer, according to the study. And a 2015 study suggested that the diet may help ward off cognitive decline.
Previous studies have also shown a reduced risk of breast cancer in women who eat a Mediterranean diet, Martinez-Gonzalez said.
A strength of the new study is that unlike those previous studies, in which women were asked to report what foods they ate, women in the new study were randomized to a specific diet, which eliminates certain factors that can influence the results, Dr. Mitchell Katz, a deputy editor of JAMA and the author of an editorial about the study, told Live Science.
The study did have limitations, including the small number of cases of breast cancer, and that all of the participants were white, post-menopausal women who were at risk of heart disease, Katz wrote in his editorial.
The next steps would be to do larger studies in places where the Mediterranean diet is not so commonly eaten, he told Live Science.
Still, he encouraged women to try out the diet: "Although no diet is perfect, a Mediterranean diet [rich in] olive oil is likely good for your health," Katz said.
Martinez-Gonzalez agreed. Women should be encouraged to eat more extra-virgin olive oil, salads with fresh vegetables and have fruit for dessert, he said.
Women's consumption of red meat and processed meat, sweet desserts, soda and fast food should be reduced, he said.
taken from: http://www.livescience.com/52155-mediterranean-diet-breast-
cancer.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=more-from-livescience
Women who get migraines have different levels of certain fats in their blood than women who don't get these headaches, a small new study suggests.
If confirmed, the new findings could lead to a blood test that could diagnose patients with migraines, the researchers said.
Currently, patients are diagnosed with migraines on the basis of the symptoms they report, said study author Dr. B. Lee Peterlin, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. "In other words, there is no biomarker or blood test that can help us to differentiate" people who get migraines from those who do not, she said.
In the study, the researchers examined blood samples from 52 women with episodic migraines and 36 women who did not have any headaches. "Episodic migraines" means having migraine headaches up to 14 days per month; people who have more migraines than that are diagnosed with chronic migraines. The women in the study had headaches about six days per month, on average.
The researchers tested the women's blood samples for a class of lipids that had previously been shown to play a role in regulating energy balance and inflammation, according to the study.
The investigators found that the levels of lipids called ceramides were lower in the women with episodic migraines than in the women who did not have any headaches. The women with migraines had about 6,000 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) of ceramides in their blood on average, compared with about 10,500 ng/ml in the women without headaches.
Moreover, it also turned out that women's risk of migraines increased with higher levels of two types of a different lipid, called sphingomyelin.
These results suggest that the lipids examined in the study may be involved in causing migraines; however, further study of this question is needed, the researchers said.
In another experiment in the new study, the investigators looked at the levels of the lipids in blood samples from 14 participants, without knowing which of the women had migraines. They found that they were able to correctly identify, based on the blood test, the women with migraines and those who did not have any headaches.
"This study is a very important contribution to our understanding of the underpinnings of migraine, and may have wide-ranging effects in diagnosing and treating migraine if the results are replicated in further studies," Dr. Karl Ekbom, of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, who was not involved in the new research, wrote in an editorial accompanying the study, published today (Sept. 9) in the journal Neurology.
However, the study had some limitations: All of the participants were women, and it did not include people with chronic migraines, who have headaches 15 or more days per month, Ekbom noted.
Previous research has linked migraines to lipid metabolism problems, such as hypercholesterolemia, a condition in which people have very high levels of cholesterol in the blood, the authors of the new study said.
taken from: http://www.livescience.com/52128-migraines-headache-blood-
fats.html
Getting too much or too little sleep may increase a person's risk of heart disease, according to a new study from South Korea.
Men and women in the study who snoozed for 9 or more hours per night had more calcium in their arterial walls and stiffer arteries — two factors that put them at risk for heart disease — than those who slept 7 hours a night. However, people who slept for 5 or fewer hours per night also showed these two risk factors, according to the study.
Sleep quality mattered, too. The researchers found that the people who said they slept poorly were more likely to have these two early signs of heart disease than those who said they slept better, according to the study, published today (Sept. 10) in the journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology.
Previous studies had found that inadequate sleep is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and stroke, Dr. Chan-Won Kim, an associate professor at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital in South Korea and one of the lead authors of the study, said in an email. But it's possible that other factors, such as depression or obesity, also contributed to the risk, he said.
"A key characteristic of our study is that we studied early markers of heart disease in healthy men and women, before symptoms related to heart disease occur," Kim told Live Science.
In the study, the researchers looked at more than 47,000 young and middle-age adults who reported how long and how well they slept. For about 29,000 of the participants, the researchers looked at data from health screening tests on the amount of calcium in the arteries. For the other 18,000 participants, the researchers looked at data on how stiff the arteries were.
The study showed a "U-shaped curve" between sleep duration and these early signs of heart disease, he said. That means that, as you approach either extreme, your risk of heart disease goes up.
But sleep needs can vary from person to person, Kim said. Some people might feel well rested with just 6 hours of sleep, as opposed to the standard recommended 7 hours, he said.
It is important for people to both get enough sleep and get good-quality sleep, Kim said.
It could be that there really is an optimal amount of sleep, and when people veer away from that, their health is affected, said Dr. Susan Redline, a professor of sleep medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, who was not involved in the study.
Many studies have reported increased rates of stroke, heart disease and even early death in people who sleep too long or too short, Redline told Live Science.
And sleep problems are consistently associated with risk factors for the development of heart disease and diseases of the blood vessels, such as hormone disturbances and inflammation, she said.
Given the link between sleep and heart health, it's important for doctors to ask patients about disturbances in their sleep, Redline said. "Just as you would recommend someone who's overweight to lose weight, or someone who's smoking to stop smoking," people who are having trouble sleeping should be encouraged to see a sleep specialist, she said.
"It's much easier to prevent disease than to treat disease," she said.
taken from: http://www.livescience.com/52140-poor-sleep-heart- disease.html
by Alina Bradford, Live Science Contributor | September 24, 2015 12:07am ET
The ear isn’t just the hearing organ. It is a complex system of parts that not only allows humans to hear, but also makes it possible for humans to walk.
Size
Ears come in many shapes and sizes. Typically, men’s ears are larger than women’s, according to a study in the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Researchers also found that the average ear is about 2.5 inches (6.3 centimeters) long, and the average ear lobe is 0.74 inches (1.88 cm) long and 0.77 inches (1.96 cm) wide. They also noted that the ear does indeed get larger as a person ages.
Another study at Texas Tech University confirmed this observation. The study found that as people age, the ear's circumference increases on average 0.51 millimeters per year, likely due to aging changes of collagen. A correlation between age and ear circumference can be put into an equation: Ear circumference in mm = 88.1 + (0.51 x subject's age). Conversely, a person’s age can therefore be calculated by the size of a person’s ear, using the equation: Subject's age = 1.96 x (Ear circumference in mm – 88.1)
Function
The ear has three main parts: external ear, middle ear and inner ear. They all have different, but important, features that facilitate hearing and balance.
Hearing
The external ear, also called the auricle or pinna, is the loop of cartilage and skin that is attached to outside of the head. It works much like a megaphone. Sound is funneled through the external ear and piped into the external auditory canal, according to Nebraska Medicine. The auditory canal is the part of the ear hole that can easily be seen when looking an ear up close.
The sound waves pass through the auditory canal and reach the tympanic membrane, better known as the eardrum. Just like a drum being hit be a drumstick, the thin sheet of connective tissue vibrates when sound waves strike it.
The vibrations pass through the tympanic membrane and enter the middle ear, also called the tympanic cavity. The tympanic cavity is lined with mucosa and filled with air and the auditory ossicles, which are three tiny bones called the malleus (hammer), incus (anvil), and stapes (stirrup), according to Encyclopedia Britannica.
As the bones vibrate, the stapes pushes a structure called the oval window in and out, according to the National Library of Medicine (NLM). This action is passed on to the inner ear and the cochlea, a fluid-filled, spiral-shaped structure that contains the spiral organ of Corti, which is the receptor organ for hearing. Tiny hair cells in this organ translate the vibrations into electrical impulses that are carried to the brain by sensory nerves.
Anatomy of the ear. Credit: Alila Medical Media | Shutterstock
The Eustachian tube, or pharyngotympanic tube, in the middle ear equalizes air pressure in the middle ear with the air pressure in the atmosphere. This process helps humans retain their balance.
The vestibular complex, in the inner ear, is also important to balance because it contains receptors that regulate a sense of equilibrium. The inner ear is connected to the vestibulocochlear nerve, which carries sound and equilibrium information to the brain.
Diseases & conditions
Ears are delicate organs that can often have problems due to damage, bacteria or even changes in the environment.
Ear infections are the most common illness in babies and younger children, according to the NLM. Common symptoms of ear infections are drainage from the ear, hearing loss, earache, fever, headaches, pain in the ear and a feeling of fullness in the ear, according to the American Academy of Family Physicians.
Meniere's disease a disease of the inner ear that may be the result of fluid problems inside the ear. Symptoms include hearing loss, pressure or pain, dizziness and tinnitus. Tinnitus is a roaring in the ears. It can also be caused by loud noises, medicines or a variety of other causes.
Ear barotrauma is an injury to the ear due to changes in barometric or water pressure, according to the NLM. It typically occurs during flights in an airplane, traveling to places at high altitudes or diving into deep waters. Symptoms include pain, stuffy ears, hearing loss and dizziness. Barotrauma can usually be fixed by “popping” the ears by yawning, chewing gum or trying to blow outward while keeping the nose pinched and mouth closed.
Ear wax, also called cerumen, has antibacterial properties and also lubricates and protects the ear. Normal amounts shouldn’t bother most people, though sometimes, wax can build up and should be removed, according to The American Academy of Otolaryngology. Symptoms of wax build-up is a feeling of blockage in the ears, coughing, odor, discharge, itching and hearing loss.
Hearing typically declines with age naturally, though damage to the ear can cause hearing loss at a very young age. “We are seeing more and more patients with significant hearing loss as early as the late teenaged years," Dr. Sreekant Cherukuri, a board-certified otolaryngologist based in Chicago and the founder of MDHearingAid, told Live Science. "Noise-induced hearing loss is a growing problem in this country. We are connected to phones and music players, often for hours each day. When our ears are exposed to harmful noise, delicate cells in the inner ear become damaged. Unfortunately, the damage is cumulative over time.”
Promoting good ear health
Once hearing is gone, it is impossible to repair it naturally. Most patients with hearing loss need surgery or hearing aids. “The good news is that this is 100 percent preventable," said Cherukuri. "I tell my patients to follow the 60-60 rule when they use earbuds or headphones: no more than 60 percent of full volume for no longer than 60 minutes at a time."
People who participate in noisy activities or hobbies, such as sporting events, music concerts, shooting sports, motorcycle riding or mowing the lawn, should also wear earplugs or noise-canceling or noise-blocking headphones to help protect the ears.
Careful cleaning is another way to prevent hearing loss and damage. The American Academy of Otolaryngology suggests cleaning the external ear with a cloth. Then, put a few drops of mineral oil, baby oil, glycerin, or commercial drops in the ear to soften the wax and help it drain out of the ear. A few drops of hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide may also help. Never insert anything into the ear.
taken from: http://www.livescience.com/52287-ear-anatomy.html
A plastic bag floats in the sea off the Philippines. Ocean plastic has turned up literally everywhere. It has been found in the deep sea and buried in Arctic ice. PHOTOGRAPH BY KEITH A. ELLENBOGEN, AP
Scientists have come up with a new way to measure ocean trash—and the numbers are even worse than thought.
In 2010, eight million tons of plastic trash ended up in the ocean from coastal countries—far more than the total that has been measured floating on the surface in the ocean's "garbage patches."
That's the bad news. The even worse news is that the tonnage is on target to increase tenfold in the next decade unless the world finds a way to improve how garbage is collected and managed.
The findings are part of a groundbreaking study published Thursday inScience that for the first time quantifies how much garbage flows into the world's oceans every year.
Until now, most efforts to measure ocean debris have involved sample counts of plastic floating on the surface in large garbage patches in each of the world's oceans. A study last year, for example, estimated the amount of floating trash to be 245,000 tons at most.
Worst Offenders
The new study also identifies the major sources of plastic debris and names the top 20 countries generating the greatest amount of ocean-bound trash. China is first. The United States is 20th. The rest of the list includes 11 other Asian countries, Turkey, five African countries, and Brazil.
The rankings in this chart reflect the largest total amounts of plastic waste flowing into the oceans annually, not the highest per capita amounts. For example, Bangladesh ranks 10th overall, with 867,879 tons, but 187th per capita, at 346 pounds per person. Denmark ranks 143rd overall with 1,974 tons, but 19th per capita, at 1,883 pounds per person. NG STAFF; J. L. WANG. SOURCE: SCIENCE
Even though the United States has a highly developed garbage collection system, it nevertheless made the top 20 for two reasons: It has a large, dense coastal population and, as a wealthy nation, is a large consumer of products. (See video: "Are You Eating Plastic for Dinner?")
"What we have done is look at the other side of the equation—what's coming out of the faucet, rather than what's already in the bathtub," says Kara Lavender Law, an oceanographer at the Sea Education Association in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and a co-author of the report.
"The size of the discrepancy is huge—20 to 2,000 times more than the range of estimates of floating debris. That is pretty shocking, especially when you consider that the amount going into the ocean in a single year and what we're counting in the oceans has been going in for 50 years."
To make the figure eight million tons comprehensible, Jenna Jambeck, the University of Georgia environmental engineer who led the study, likens it to lining up five grocery bags of trash on every foot of coastline around the globe.
"And by 2025, those five grocery bags of plastic are going to be ten bags," she says.
That would be 155 million tons a year if present garbage management practices remain the same.
Plastic, Plastic Everywhere
Jambeck and her team combined population and economic data from 192 coastal countries bordering the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans in addition to the Black and Mediterranean Seas. They found that these countries created 275 million tons of garbage annually, of which 4.8 to 12.7 million tons of plastic flowed into the oceans. That's only 2 to 5 percent of the total waste created in those countries.
The use of plastics for consumer products has become increasingly dominant, and production has steadily increased since the material was first put into wide use a half century ago. In 2012, for example, 288 million tons of plastic were manufactured globally.
Ocean plastic has turned up literally everywhere. It has been found in the deep sea and buried in Arctic ice. It has been ingested with dire consequences by some 700 species of marine wildlife.
Reef islands can grow and change shape as sediments shift, studies show.
Tuvalu weather forecaster Niko Iona stands on the tennis-court-size islet of Tepuka Savilivili, on the western rim of Funafuti atoll. The islet was stripped of its sediments and vegetation in 1997 by a cyclone.
PHOTOGRAPH BY ROBIN HAMMOND, PANOS PICTURES
By Kennedy Warne, for National Geographic
PUBLISHED
"If you were faced with the threat of the disappearance of your nation, what would you do?"
It's a question that leaders of Pacific Island states have been asking for decades. As a warming climate drives sea levels upward, low-lying island nations face an uncertain future—or no future at all, say these leaders, who warn of their nations' imminent disappearance.
Officials in Tuvalu, 600 miles (965 kilometers) north of Fiji, have been some of the most vocal critics of the world's large greenhouse gas emitters—industrialized nations such as the United States and China—which they accuse of not doing enough to curb emissions, contributing to the melting of ice sheets and rising seas.
NG MAPS
SOURCES: USGS/EROS; P.S. KENCH ET AL. , GEOMORPHOLOGY
"I carry a huge burden and responsibility," Sopoaga told the climate summit delegates in Peru. "It keeps me awake at night. Will we survive? Or will we disappear under the sea?"
These are desperate questions. But how real is the threat? Are island nations like Tuvalu, where most of the land is barely above sea level, destined to sink beneath the waves, like modern-day Atlantises?
Not necessarily, according to a growing body of evidence amassed by New Zealand coastal geomorphologist Paul Kench, of the University of Auckland's School of Environment, and colleagues in Australia and Fiji, who have been studying how reef islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans respond to rising sea levels.
They found that reef islands change shape and move around in response to shifting sediments, and that many of them are growing in size, not shrinking, as sea level inches upward. The implication is that many islands—especially less developed ones with few permanent structures—may cope with rising seas well into the next century.
But for the areas that have been transformed by human development, such as the capitals of Kiribati, Tuvalu, and Maldives, the future is considerably gloomier. That's largely because their many structures—seawalls, roads, and water and electricity systems—are locked in place.
Their analysis, which now extends to more than 600 coral reef islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans, indicates that about 80 percent of the islands have remained stable or increased in size (roughly 40 percent in each category). Only 20 percent have shown the net reduction that's widely assumed to be a typical island's fate when sea level rises.
Some islands grew by as much as 14 acres (5.6 hectares) in a single decade, and Tuvalu's main atoll, Funafuti—33 islands distributed around the rim of a large lagoon—has gained 75 acres (32 hectares) of land during the past 115 years.
Two-thirds of the reef islands in the study migrated lagoon-ward as their ocean-side coastlines eroded and sediment built up on the side facing the lagoon. One of Funafuti's islands shifted more than 350 feet (106 meters) over 40 years.
Reef islands, Kench says, are among the most dynamic landforms on Earth. And Tuvalu's are some of the most dynamic on record.
With a scant ten square miles (26 square kilometers) of dry land, Tuvalu is one of the smallest countries in the world. Although there are many atolls and islands in the group, which lies midway between Australia and Hawaii, more than half of Tuvalu's 12,000 people live on just one island—Fongafale—on the eastern rim of Funafuti atoll.
Low-lying stretches of atoll islands such as Fongafale, Tuvalu's most populous island, are sometimes overwashed by the highest spring tides, called king tides, which occur a few times a year.
PHOTOGRAPH BY JOCELYN CARLIN, PANOS PICTURES
Business as Usual
I first came to Tuvalu ten years ago, my interest piqued by news reports suggesting (and sometimes stating outright) that the islands were doomed. Journalists had latched on to countries such as Tuvalu, Kiribati, and Maldives as the environmental hard-luck stories of the new millennium.
These postcard paradises had become poster children for a planetary crisis, with their inhabitants cast as the world's first climate refugees. "Tuvalu Sinks Today—The Rest of Us Tomorrow?" was a typical headline.
A prominent environmental campaigner had declared that Tuvalu's leaders had "conceded defeat in their battle with the rising sea, announcing that they will abandon their homeland."
That islands like Tuvalu face an intensifying barrage of climate impacts is not in doubt.
More than 6,000 Tuvaluans cram onto Fongafale, a boomerang-shaped sliver of land on the edge of a vast lagoon. The highest elevation on Fongafale is only a few yards above sea level, making the island vulnerable to rising seas.
PHOTOGRAPH BY KOENE/HOLLANDSE HOOGTE, REDUX
Besides the damage inflicted by sea-level rise itself—coastal erosion, surface flooding, and saltwater intrusion into soil and groundwater—they will suffer from increasingly frequent and severe weather extremes (droughts and cyclones) and die-offs of their coral reefs through ocean warming and acidification, leading to potential collapse of marine ecosystems that provide food and livelihoods for island dwellers.
But from what I could see, in 2004 it was business as usual in Funafuti. Government staff were about to move into a brand-new building overlooking the lagoon. The country's first cell-phone tower had just been erected. Tuvalu was enjoying a windfall profit from the sale of its "dot tv" Internet suffix. Tuvaluans seemed in no hurry to evacuate their supposedly disappearing homeland.
In November 2014, armed with Kench's findings, I returned to Tuvalu to see whether anything had changed. The first thing I noticed was that Fongafale was even more crowded than before. According to the 2012 census, Fongafale's population had increased by 1,500 since my earlier visit, to more than 6,000. So much for the shutting down of a nation.
Island Building
I hired a fishing dory and made a spray-drenched trip across Funafuti's 106-square-mile (275-square-kilometer) lagoon to an uninhabited island called Tepuka. It has the classic appearance of an atoll island: a pancake of sand with a mop of vegetation and, floating above, a confetti of seabirds.
Such islands look static, but they are perpetual construction sites. Their surrounding coral reefs are factories that produce a constant supply of raw building material: calcium carbonate.
The factory "workers" are biological agents that turn the skeletons of corals and other carbonate-containing creatures into sediment. Fish, sea urchins, and sponges are the principal processors. In one year they can produce four pounds of sediment per square foot (21 kilograms per square meter) of reef.
Coral rubble, here washed up on the shores of Fongafale, is the building material of reef islands. It is pulverized by wave action and worked into the substrates of the islands, often causing them to grow in size even as sea levels rise.
PHOTOGRAPH BY PATRICK AVENTURIER, GAMMA-RAPHO/GETTY
Mollusks, calcium-secreting algae, and tiny marine creatures called foraminifera add to the sediment supply. Tepuka's beaches have an orange tinge from billions of foraminifera skeletons.
Geomorphologists, who study landforms, speak of an island's "carbonate budget"—its sedimentary profit-and-loss account. On the income side of the ledger is the rubble, gravel, and sand produced by the reef ecosystem or imported into it, by storms, for instance. On the expenditure side is sediment lost by being abraded to microscopic fineness, dissolved in seawater, or exported by waves or currents into the deep ocean.
The budget can stay more or less balanced for decades, centuries, even millennia, and then experience a sudden blowout, as when Cyclone Bebe hit Funafuti in 1972. Overnight the storm deposited a 12-mile (19-kilometer) ridge of coral rubble up to 13 feet (4 meters) high.
That material was worked into the matrix of several reef islands on the southeastern side of the atoll—the side that took the brunt of Bebe's force—increasing the land area by 10 percent.
Tepuka, on the western side, missed out on the Bebe deposit and is one of a handful of Funafuti's islands that have been shrinking. On the ocean side of the island, a three-foot-high (one meter) scarp of sandy soil up against the vegetation showed where wave action was scouring away the land.
I'd seen this kind of erosion on island coastlines elsewhere in the world and had assumed it was evidence of irreversible loss. But Kench's work offers a different narrative: abrasion on one side of an island, accretion on the other, with entire islands shifting on their reef platforms in response to wind, waves, and sea-level change.
Yes, islands erode, Kench says, and that's often what people focus on: broad beaches where they used to play soccer as kids now reduced to a narrow patch of sand. Or perhaps the edge of a property crumbling into the sea. Or a family grave undermined by the tide.
"But they often forget to look at the other sides of the islands, where beaches are growing," Kench adds.
In Tepuka's case, a net loss in area of 22 percent since 1896 is only part of the story. The island has undergone an almost constant reworking of its sedimentary material during the past century. It's grown longer (by 550 feet, or 170 meters) and narrower (by 390 feet, or 120 meters), and its position has rotated clockwise on the reef.
Tuvalu's government buildings stand on the western shore of Fongafale, overlooking Funafuti lagoon. Permanent structures such as buildings, roads, and electricity networks make it hard for developed islands to adapt to the dynamic changes in shape and size that reef islands undergo.
PHOTOGRAPH BY JOCELYN CARLIN, PANOS PICTURES
Although it's shrinking now, a big-enough storm could push Tepuka's sediment budget back into the black. It's happened before. Geological surveys across the island have shown that at times, large sections have been washed over by the sea, with tons of sediment deposited on top of the existing vegetation.
The lesson of Tepuka, Kench says, is that it's important to focus on what sediment is doing and not just on sea level.
Rising Seas Don't Equal Sinking Islands
Tepuka is very young, having formed 500 to 1,000 years ago. Polynesians—whose occupation of the islands is thought to go back more than 2,000 years—might well have watched it grow.
Tepuka's young age, says Kench, places its formation within a period of stable global sea level—which runs counter to the idea that reef islands can form only when falling sea levels trigger the processes of island building.
NG MAPS
SOURCES: USGS/EROS; P.S. KENCH ET AL. , GEOMORPHOLOGY
Other work by Kench shows that such islands can form even when sea level is rising rapidly.
His analysis of the sediments on Jabat, in the Marshall Islands, indicates that the island started forming nearly 5,000 years ago, when the oceans were rising to a peak of more than three feet (one meter) higher than today's sea level—a point that is likely to be reached again, or exceeded, by the end of this century, according topredictions by the International Panel on Climate Change.
High-energy storm action built Jabat—the very condition that's forecast to occur with greater frequency as the planet's atmosphere warms.
Kench's findings suggest that rising sea levels today might reactivate processes of island building that have long been relatively dormant.
"If sea-level rise does ramp up to the levels they're talking about," Kench says, "I would expect islands to start showing increased rates of change. The faster sea level goes up, the more dynamic these islands are going to appear."
Reef Loss, Island Gain
Some climate specialists believe that rising sea-surface temperatures and increasing ocean acidity may have an even more damaging impact on coral reefs than that caused by sea-level rise.
Since the beginning of the industrial period, some 250 years ago, the acidity of tropical surface waters has risen by 30 percent. Sea-surface temperatures have increased by about 1.8°F (1°C) during the past century.
High water temperatures kill corals, and acidification affects their ability to produce their skeletons, since calcium carbonate dissolves in acid. Laboratory experiments suggest that the calcification rate of some corals could decrease by a third over the next three to five decades.
Yet a reef's loss of living coral can be an island's gain—at least in the short term. In 1998, when a worldwide coral bleaching event killed up to one-sixth of the world's reefs, a huge repository of coral rubble became available for island building. If heat-related coral die-offs occur in coming decades, the sediment supply for islands is likely to increase.
Malé, capital of the Indian Ocean archipelago Maldives, shows the vulnerability of densely built-up, low-lying islands to rising seas.
PHOTOGRAPH BY WOLFGANG KAEHLER, LIGHTROCKET VIA GETTY IMAGES
But Kench cautions that scientists don't yet have a clear understanding of how changes in ocean chemistry will affect coral reefs, or how that might translate to islands. "We don't have a good handle on the time lag between when coral is killed and when it becomes available to an island as sand," he says.
Over the time scales that matter to island nations—the next few decades when they'll be seeking to adapt to land changes—the critical factor, Kench says, is the reworking of sands and gravels around the reef islands. "And that's controlled by wave processes and whether there's sediment available. If sand is still being produced, islands are able to adjust and maintain their area."
For Urban Islands, an Uphill Battle
"Urban islands are in trouble because they've lost their capacity to adapt," Kench says. "They're environmentally degraded. Their reefs are damaged, the sedimentation processes are undermined, and the islands aren't actively connected to their reefs. For densely urban centers, the only strategies to cope with rising sea levels will be engineered ones."
Malé, the capital of Maldives—a 1,200-atoll archipelago in the Indian Ocean, and one of the countries predicted to be most affected by climate change and rising seas—is such an island. It's encircled by built structures such as seawalls, breakwaters, harbors, and artificial beaches.
"Heavily fortified," is how Mohamed Aslam, an oceanographer by training and until 2012 the environment minister for Maldives, described it to me.
"There's no room for natural processes to take place," he says. "I suppose if you spent enough money, you could continue to keep the sea out. But it's prohibitively expensive for a country with a small population and a small GDP to do that sort of thing on every island."
Saltwater intrusion into soils makes horticulture challenging on Tuvalu's nine island groups. Gardeners like Kitiona Tausi, above, try various methods to raise their plant beds above the salination level. On one island, Tuvalu's most important crop, a starchy tuber called pulaka, is grown in compost within concrete pits.
PHOTOGRAPH BY JOCELYN CARLIN, PANOS PICTURES
But urbanized atoll islands are the exception in the Pacific. For less developed islands, supporting much smaller populations, Kench can foresee a future in which people coexist with island changes by developing agricultural practices that circumvent the problems of salinized soils, by harvesting and using fresh water more efficiently, and by building cyclone-resistant structures such as pole houses, which allow storm surges to wash through with minimal damage.
Aslam agrees that a combination of natural processes and human intervention may enable island communities to cope with climate impacts. But he believes that the time horizon for adaptation is limited.
He likens the situation to a person's immune system fighting an infection.
"The islands are going to fight back as the environment changes, and adjust themselves to new equilibriums. But there may come a point when they can no longer do that, and we don't know when that point will be reached. The biggest fear island people have is not knowing what will happen beyond that point."
Much depends on the rate at which sea-level rise accelerates during the second half of this century.
He says that Maldives has decided that it's not enough just to advocate for international action on climate change—the country must take an active role in mitigation. Accordingly, Maldives has committed itself to low-carbon economic growth and achieving a carbon-neutral economy by 2020.
"What we're saying to the world is, 'If Maldives can do it, you can do it.' It's important to us not just to talk but to lead by example."
Less Apocalyptic Rhetoric, More Strategic Thinking
What low-lying island nations need to do, Kench says, is to take stock of their assets: the islands themselves. "Yet these countries know so little about their islands," he says. "They can't tell you how an island's changed or shifted over time. They don't even know how high they are.
"If these nations had land-planning units dedicated to collecting data on changing island morphology, they'd have a basis to say, 'These islands over here seem to be growing,' or 'These seem to be eroding on this side but accreting on the other.' They could make informed decisions about where to develop—which islands to use for agriculture, which ones to mine for aggregate."
Flooding during king tides is a problem on Fongafale, when water percolating up through the coral matrix laps even at the door of the meteorological office.
PHOTOGRAPH BY JOCELYN CARLIN, PANOS PICTURES
As Kench sees it, Pacific leaders should get off their soapboxes and invest their energy in thinking strategically about how they'll confront the environmental changes taking place, changes that are causing food security issues and water shortages.
"I'd rather hear the prime minister of Tuvalu or the president of Kiribati stand up and say to the international community: 'We want to be here in a hundred years. We're facing enormous environmental challenges. Help us plan effectively.'
"Donor agencies would be falling over themselves to support them—because countries like Australia and New Zealand don't want a wave of climate refugees on their doorstep. But standing up and saying, 'We're all washing away'—what's the good of that?"
Attend to the "Causes of the Disease"
I asked Enele Sopoaga, Tuvalu's prime minister, whether Kench's findings on island resilience had caused him to review his approach and rhetoric.
"Not at all," he told me by telephone. The industrialized nations are still far from changing their perception of the threats faced by small island nations, he said. So he intends to keep holding them to account.
I asked him a hypothetical question: If a patient is told she has three weeks to live, and then the doctors change their minds and say she has three years to live, should that alter the approach to treatment? There's a lot more time to explore the options.
"Our attention should not be on the prognosis of the patient but the causes of the disease," Sopoaga countered. "Unsustainable consumption, an energy mix based on fossil fuels—these are causing havoc to countries like Tuvalu, and still these issues are not being seriously confronted."
Besides, he added, there are moral issues that must be addressed concerning the responsibility the big emitters have to help small countries such as Tuvalu, which have contributed next to nothing to global warming. "It's only fair for us to ask for assistance, considering the daunting issues we face."
I recalled the thundering quote on this theme Sopoaga gave at the Lima summit—a literary left jab from the medieval poet Dante: "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis."
Meanwhile, in the islands themselves, life goes imperturbably on. At dusk on Fongafale, the evening games of soccer and volleyball start up on the grassy strip next to the runway, and a succession of Tuvaluan men balancing slop buckets on their motor scooters ride to their pigpens beside the mangroves.
Despite the long-term threats to their islands, Tuvaluans remain ebullient. Many in this strongly Christian country hold to the scriptural promise of God to Noah, that floods would never again destroy the Earth.
PHOTOGRAPH BY JOCELYN CARLIN, PANOS PICTURES
On a scooter ride through the village, I find that Toomu Sione, an elderly statesman, is still sitting, shirtless, just where he was when I met him ten years ago, in a breezy open-sided sleeping platform outside his house. While we talk, his wife adjusts a piece of coral rock she's using for a pillow.
I remind him of something he told me during my last visit. It was a traditional saying, spoken to young people who leave their villages for the bright lights of foreign shores: "Your climbing rope awaits you." No matter how long you're away from Tuvalu, the islands will draw you back. You'll take your place in the community again, climb the coconut palms again.
The saying sums up the characteristic resourcefulness and resilience of island people. You work with what you've got. You lose some, you win some—much like the reef islands themselves, eroding and abrading through geological time. You endure.
taken from: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/02/150213-tuvalu- sopoaga-kench-kiribati-maldives-cyclone-marshall-islands/